Each product that is being marketed widely will have a unique ‘Trade Mark’ of its own. It could be a name, symbol, or other device to identify a product. It will be officially registered and legally restricted to the use of the owner or manufacturer.
Occasions had been there where an individual or company had marketed his product in the popular trade mark of another owner or manufacturer. This is a decisive act, to sell an inferior product in the guise of a popularly selling product of an established manufacturer.
In such cases, the original owner of the registered trade mark will go for litigation against the person who had made an infringement of his trademark.
MISSION STATEMENT
Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.
CASE LAW | RESOURCES | FORUMS | NEWS ROOM
Demanding Justice, Truth and Court-ordered reparations
Respect Judicial decisions and uphold the rule of law.
Mindful, in particular, that a judgment debt is hanging over the Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates. The judgment is binding and enforceable by the court of Abu Dhabi from where the ruling came from. It should also be kept in mind that successor governments remain bound by the acts incurred by the predecessor governments. The Judgment debt of Abu Dhabi, can be eliminated or satisfied by the enforcement of judgments and legal remedies...Investors
An innovative project ‘Judgment For Sale’
"The legal instruments that a nation or government develops are aimed at dealing effectively with every crime and providing meaningful relief to victims of their circumstances. When these legal principles are ignored it would only erode the public faith and confidence in the judicial system"...A project is aimed at giving effect to Court Judgments that remains unexecuted or unsatisfied
Is the External Affairs Ministry of India above the Law?
The External Affairs Ministry, Government of India, Respondent in C.W.No.4972/97 (C.M.9144/97) was directed by High Court of Delhi, an order of mandamus to dispose of the representation submitted by petitioner within two months of the date of the Judgment. The directives contained in the judgment of Delhi High Court was dated 20-11-1997. In total negation of such a specific order of the Delhi High Court, the External Affairs Ministry, despite the lapse of 16 years of date of the judgment, demonstrates a blatant disrespect to the law of the country....Is the External Affairs Ministry of India above the Law?
